Blog

(From : http://docketreport.blogspot.com - August 15 , 2018 )

Following summary judgment, the court granted defendant's motion to join plaintiff's founder/inventor as a necessary party and pursue attorney fees against him under 35 U.S.C. § 285.

(From : http://feeds.feedburner.com - August 15 , 2018 )

While registration is required in order to file a lawsuit for copyright in federal court, there is currently a circuit split with regard to what part of the process must be complete in order to meet the “registration” standard.  According to 17 U.

(From : http://feeds.feedburner.com - August 15 , 2018 )

U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer of the Southern District of New York recently entered an opinion and order in a copyright case involving the famed “Last Sitting” photographs of American movie star Marilyn Monroe.

(From : http://feeds.feedburner.com - August 15 , 2018 )

By Kevin E. Noonan -- On August 8th, the U.S.

(From : http://feeds.feedburner.com - August 14 , 2018 )

It seems clear that the Supreme Court did not intend to categorically prohibit patenting of everything which can be characterized as an abstract idea at some level because the Court indicated that there are at least some abstract ideas that are su

(From : http://docketreport.blogspot.com - August 14 , 2018 )

Following remand, the court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment to preclude plaintiff from seeking pre-suit damages and rejected plaintiff's argument that the jury's willful infringement finding satisfied plaintiff's obligation to est

(From : http://feeds.feedburner.com - August 14 , 2018 )

On August 1st, a jury verdict entered in the Southern District of California awarded $145.1 million in reasonable royalty damages to Canadian IP licensing firm Wi-LAN in a patent infringement case against Cupertino, CA-based consumer device giant

(From : http://feeds.lexblog.com - August 14 , 2018 )

(From : http://feeds.feedburner.com - August 14 , 2018 )

By Joseph Herndon -- On August 8, 2018, Director Iancu issued a letter to the Patent Public Advisory Committee notifying of proposed fee increases at the U.S.

(From : http://feeds.feedburner.com - August 13 , 2018 )

MPEP 2141 actually cites to Arendi, but then quotes the case entirely out of context.