Modern discovery can be quite disruptive and expensive.
The court awarded defendant its attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285 and rejected plaintiff's argument that defendant was not entitled to attorney fees prior to claim construction.
Nothing in my own experience leads me to believe that the PTO applies a lower anticipation or obviousness standard to pharmaceuticals, and I expect this would be news to my colleagues in the industry too.
For IP due diligence for investment in a start-up or young company, the most important conversation is with the key developer(s) of the product(s) or service(s) [the “Conversation”]. Ideally, the Conversation is led by an IP attorney who understa
District Court Throws Out Haptic Feedback Claims on Grounds of Patent Ineligible Subject Matter By James Korenchan -- Last week, Judge Koh of the U.S.
March 20, 2018 - "How to Secure and Exploit Patents for Combination Therapies" (J A Kemp) - 3:30 to 4:30 pm (GMT) March 20, 2018 - Technology Center 1700 Customer Partnership meeting (U.S.
A casual observer may read the Aatrix dissent, or cases cited therein, to say it is improper to consider extrinsic evidence. In particular, the dissent quotes Secured Mail Sols. LLC v. Universal Wilde, Inc., 873 F.3d 905, 912 (Fed. Cir.
in Ottah v. Fiat Chrysler, Chikezie Ottah appealed the lower court’s grant of summary judgment of non-infringement and dismissal of the complaint with prejudice.
In SimpleAir v.
The Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO) will offer a one-hour webinar entitled "Patent Prosecution Estoppel from PTAB Proceedings" on March 29, 2018 from 2:00 to 3:00 pm ET.