Blog

(From : http://www.greenpatentblog.com - August 18 , 2017 )

(From : http://feeds.feedburner.com - August 18 , 2017 )

Boulder, CO-based shoe manufacturer Crocs, Inc. (NASDAQ:CROX) had a design patent rejected by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. The patent struck by the USPTO is U.S. Patent No. D517789.

(From : http://docketreport.blogspot.com - August 18 , 2017 )

Following a jury trial, the court denied defendant's renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law on the ground that plaintiff’s messaging patent encompassed unpatentable subject matter because the asserted claims were not directed toward an ab

(From : http://feeds.feedburner.com - August 18 , 2017 )

Avid sought fees as a prevailing party under § 285, and therefore the attorney’s fees in this action were properly characterized as an equitable remedy, properly decided by a judge.

(From : http://feeds.feedburner.com - August 18 , 2017 )

In mag Fasteners, Inc. v.

(From : http://feeds.feedburner.com - August 18 , 2017 )

In a patent infringement case governed by the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (“BPCIA”), the Federal Circuit found that it lacked jurisdiction to compel discovery in the district court.

(From : http://feeds.feedburner.com - August 18 , 2017 )

District Court Finds Method of Detecting Claim to Be Directed to Patent Ineligible Subject Matter By Donald Zuhn -- Earlier this month, in Cleveland Clinic Foundation v. True Health Diagnostics, LLC, District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema of the U.S.

(From : http://feeds.feedburner.com - August 17 , 2017 )

The Wall Street Journal explains ithat the Silicon Valley culture has long regarded copying as a good thing and necessary for rapid growth, first to market, first mover advantage, network effects, world domination, liquidity for early investors an

(From : http://docketreport.blogspot.com - August 17 , 2017 )

The magistrate judge recommended granting plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment that their patents were not unenforceable for inequitable conduct or unclean hands because the failure to submit a copy of a disclosed PGR institution decision was

(From : http://feeds.feedburner.com - August 17 , 2017 )

The USPTO issued Examination Guide 01-17 on Monday, June 26, 2017, entitled “Examination Guidance for Section 2(a)’s Disparagement Provision after Matal v.